Wearable neurotech devices are increasingly prevalent, capable of tracking brain waves and physiological data. As these devices evolve, they pose new legal challenges regarding privacy, informed consent, and data security. Experts stress the need for clear legal definitions, particularly concerning what constitutes 'neurodata' and the implications for users' privacy. The complexity surrounding intended use and marketing further complicates the development of appropriate regulations, leaving users potentially vulnerable.
While the technology is still being tested, it could help with everything from management of chronic pain to monitoring the brain activity of students and criminal suspects.
The legal line between the nervous system and the muscular system is blurry. These questions of scope will be discussed and possibly litigated in the future.
Collection
[
|
...
]