"The appeals court ruled that the trial judge must clarify whether his injunction interferes with the administration's plans for safety and security, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment of national security implications."
"Government lawyers contended that the ballroom project includes critical security features designed to protect against threats such as drones, ballistic missiles, and biohazards, asserting that halting construction would endanger the President and others in the White House."
"The trial judge, Richard Leon, determined that the preservationist group was likely to succeed in their challenge, citing the president's lack of authority to proceed without congressional approval, while allowing necessary safety-related construction to continue."
A federal appeals court has instructed a judge to reconsider the national security implications of halting the construction of President Trump's $400 million White House ballroom. The court found insufficient information to determine how much of the project can be paused without endangering the safety of the president and White House staff. The trial judge had previously barred work without congressional approval but allowed a temporary pause. Government lawyers argued that the project includes essential security features to protect against various threats, while the judge noted the preservationist group's likelihood of success in their legal challenge.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]