"With the now fixed Glynn's Anvil aspect on my legs and with 58 max stacks of Resolve my toughness in combat went from 9 million to 52 million. Don't sit on this aspect, it's extremely strong, lets you basically roll off most other defensive rolls on your gear and other places to put in more offence."
"It increases your maximum Resolve by 2 and gives you 2.5 - 4 percent extra damage reduction per stack. Existing stacks of Resolve provide 25 percent damage reduction and are consumed with each hit taken, with players normally only being able to stack it up to eight times."
"Players are basically taking all of their gear, adding Aspect of Glynn's Anvil to it (it's not exclusive to the Paladin class), and then tempering the armor to push the maximum number of Resolve stacks attainable as high as possible. This new meta-defining shift has already spread all across YouTube as users like Wudijo and others show how to optimize around it."
"The trouble began with Paladin's Aspect of Glynn's Anvil. It increases your maximum Resolve by 2 and gives you 2.5 - 4 percent extra damage reduction per stack. Existing stacks of Resolve provide 25 percent damage reduction and are consumed with each hit taken, with players normally only being able to stack it up to eight times."
Aspect of Glynn's Anvil increases maximum Resolve and grants damage reduction per Resolve stack. Resolve stacks are normally limited, consumed when hits are taken, and provide a capped amount of damage reduction. After the Lord of Hatred launch, the aspect initially failed to grant the expected damage reduction. A later patch intended to correct the issue instead caused the aspect to grant far more damage reduction than intended. Players reported toughness rising dramatically after reaching very high Resolve stacks, reaching dozens of maximum stacks. The resulting approach involves applying the aspect to multiple gear pieces and tempering armor to maximize Resolve stacks, creating a new defensive meta that makes higher difficulty content easier.
Read at Kotaku
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]