"Nvidia could've marketed its new DLSS 5 real-time lighting technology as a way to make future, next-gen games look better. Instead, it told the world that games people already know and love look bad. It focused on retconning characters' faces. And now, confronted with the predictable backlash, Nvidia's CEO is telling critics that we're "completely wrong.""
"Regardless of how it works, the tech presents as an AI filter that tries to optimize everyone and everything - artists be damned. A 15-year-old Hogwarts student? Now he's like an adult soap opera star trying to pass as a teen. An already-aged professor at Hogwarts? What if we made her look even older?"
"Down the road, there's another problem: Everything might start looking the same. As my colleague Andrew Webster points out, that's what happens when your tech looks like AI slop. So what is Nvidia doing about this? Damage control is underway."
Nvidia introduced DLSS 5 real-time lighting technology by demonstrating how it could enhance existing popular games through AI-driven character face modifications. Rather than positioning the technology as beneficial for future games, Nvidia's marketing approach implied that current beloved characters needed improvement. The demonstrations showed controversial changes, including aging a young character and removing artistic elements like shadows. This strategy backfired, generating significant backlash from gamers who felt their favorite characters were being unnecessarily altered. Nvidia's CEO dismissed criticism, claiming detractors were "completely wrong." The company's focus on character optimization through AI filters raised concerns about artistic integrity and the homogenization of game aesthetics.
#ai-technology-in-gaming #character-design-ethics #dlss-5-backlash #artistic-integrity #gaming-industry-marketing
Read at The Verge
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]