"Sweeney agreed with Workman, commenting on November 26 that the tag is only relevant to "art exhibits for authorship disclosure, and to digital content licensing marketplaces where buyers need to understand the rights situation." Otherwise, to Sweeney, AI disclosures "make no sense," particularly when it comes to digital game stores like Steam, because "AI will be involved in nearly all future production.""
"Sweeney isn't necessarily wrong about the last part of his statement. AI is everywhere in game development, whether we like it or not. Sony has laid out plans for using AI in gaming. EA wants its teams to look at AI as a "thought partner" while training the tech on their work. Square Enix aims to use AI to automate at least 70% of quality assurance and debugging work by 2027. And Krafton Inc. has invested $70 million to become an "AI-first company" to"
Tim Sweeney argues that AI-use labels are relevant only for art exhibits to disclose authorship and for digital content licensing marketplaces to clarify rights. He contends that AI disclosures make no sense for digital game stores because AI will be involved in nearly all future production. AI adoption is already widespread across the industry: Sony outlined plans for AI in gaming, EA frames AI as a "thought partner" and trains models on internal work, Square Enix targets automating 70% of QA and debugging by 2027, and Krafton invested $70 million to become an "AI-first" company.
Read at GameSpot
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]