Breaking Down Trump's $2B Quantum Investment: Expert Insights
Briefly

Breaking Down Trump's $2B Quantum Investment: Expert Insights
The Department of Commerce announced a $2.013 billion investment under the CHIPS and Science Act to support U.S. leadership and innovation in quantum computing. Nine companies will receive funding, and the Department will hold minority, non-controlling equity stakes in each. The equity structure is presented as a shift from treating quantum as speculative toward treating it as critical national infrastructure. The investment is described as pricing a quantum development timeline that is years shorter than prior expectations. Two funded organizations will build domestic quantum manufacturing capabilities: GlobalFoundries for architectures and modalities for large-scale quantum computers, and IBM for a quantum foundry subsidiary producing quantum-grade wafers. Seven additional companies will address engineering challenges in quantum computing.
"“The administration's $2 billion equity stake across nine quantum companies marks the moment Washington stopped treating quantum as a speculative bet and started treating it as critical national infrastructure, accelerating both the timeline for quantum capability and the urgency of the cybersecurity migration that has to run alongside it,” says Rebecca Krauthamer, CEO and Co-Founder of QuSecure."
"“Equity stakes are not grants. The federal government does not take ownership positions in technologies it considers speculative,” she states. “This is Washington pricing in a quantum timeline that is years shorter than the previous conventional wisdom.”"
"The Department intends to fund two organizations in order to establish and develop the quantum sector's domestic manufacturing abilities. These include GlobalFoundries and IBM. GlobalFoundries will focus on establishing a domestic quantum foundry for architectures and modalities for use in large-scale quantum computers. IBM will establish a quantum foundry subsidiary for quantum-grade wafers."
Read at Securitymagazine
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]