Why Most UX Portfolios Fail to Impress Stakeholders (and How to Fix It)
Briefly

Why Most UX Portfolios Fail to Impress Stakeholders (and How to Fix It)
"Over the past three years, acting as UX Manager, I've reviewed hundreds of portfolios, from emerging designers to experienced seniors. A pattern consistently emerges: Only around 10% of junior to mid-level designers include any metrics in their portfolios. Even at senior levels, metrics tend to be design-focused: task completion rates, user satisfaction, or system adoption. These measures reflect design quality and usability, but they often stop short of showing what stakeholders truly care about: business outcomes."
"When our teams talk only about usability or delight, we risk optimizing for the interface instead of the organization. Design, at its best, is a business function. It creates measurable outcomes: reduces costs, increases conversions, improves productivity. If we want design to be viewed as a true business partner, we need to show how our work contributes to growth and efficiency, not just to smoother interactions."
Only about 10% of junior to mid-level designers include any metrics in portfolios, and senior metrics often remain design-focused (task completion, satisfaction, adoption). Such measures show usability but frequently fail to demonstrate business outcomes, creating a trust gap between design teams and decision-makers. For freelancers, business metrics are especially persuasive for communicating value. Design should function as a business discipline that drives measurable results by reducing costs, increasing conversions, and improving productivity. Demonstrating how design contributes to growth and efficiency is necessary for earning a seat at the decision-making table.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]