"I've spent years watching people interact with products - not through dashboards or metrics, but through their expressions. The subtle pause before a click. The half-smile when something finally works. The sigh when it doesn't. Those small, unfiltered moments reveal more about good design than any heatmap ever could. And yet, our industry is sprinting in the opposite direction. We're trying to automate empathy - to teach algorithms how to understand what we barely understand ourselves."
"The logic is seductive: feed an AI enough data, and surely it will learn to care. But data isn't understanding, and automation isn't empathy. A 2021 PwC study found that 82% of U.S. consumers actually want more human interaction, not less. That desire sits in direct tension with our obsession to automate. Because no matter how sophisticated the model, AI can't see hesitation, frustration, or joy. It can only measure what it's told to see."
Human emotional cues—hesitation, half-smiles, sighs—reveal crucial information about product usability that quantitative metrics miss. Observing facial expressions and micro-behaviors uncovers satisfaction and frustration signals that heatmaps and dashboards cannot convey. The industry increasingly pursues automating empathy, attempting to train algorithms to interpret feelings through data alone. Data can measure specified events but cannot truly understand nuance or lived experience. Surveys indicate many consumers prefer more human interaction rather than less, creating a tension between automation and user desire. Even sophisticated models cannot perceive subtle affective states unless explicitly encoded. Human-centered design therefore requires human empathy alongside data-informed decisions.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]