The article discusses the importance of structural choices in design, emphasizing accessibility principles over mere aesthetics. It critiques the notion that design elements, like glass, automatically lead to exclusion. It also highlights the significant impact of design choices on communities and individuals, particularly within tech and AI. The evolution of autonomous AI coding agents illustrates a shift in how developers perceive these technologies, from curiosity to integral tools. Additionally, the article touches on the often misunderstood roles of translators and programmers, underlining the complexities within their professions.
These aren't just stylistic tweaks. They're structural choices grounded in accessibility principles. It would be lazy to assume that glass equals exclusion; the real work is in mastering it.
In contrast, there are design choices today that cost lives and cause great damage to communities, places and people. We often recognise these choices more as business models, especially in the world of tech and AI.
Somewhere in the last few months, something fundamental shifted for me with autonomous AI coding agents. They've gone from a 'hey this is pretty neat' curiosity to something I genuinely can't imagine working without.
To explain this apparent contradiction, we need to understand what it is translators actually do because, like us programmers, they suffer from having the nature of their work consistently misunderstood by non-translators.
Collection
[
|
...
]