Dan Abrams and Scott Jennings debated on CNN regarding Harvard's lawsuit against the Trump administration, following accusations of civil rights violations affecting Jewish students. Abrams suggested that Harvard's action was necessary, drawing parallels to Columbia University's struggles. He acknowledged the political advantages for Trump, despite predicting a legal loss. Jennings countered concerns of university control, emphasizing that the civil rights argument for Jewish students is significant. The discussion highlighted the complexities of the administration's stance and the political ramifications of targeting Ivy League institutions.
Look, it's going to be a strong legal case, and I think Harvard had kind of no choice here. Why? Because look what happened to Columbia, right? They started negotiating, and they're still getting their money held back.
I think they will lose in court, but the government's gonna pay for the defense and the administration can say, We went after the Ivy League schools.
I do believe... the fight is worth picking if only because they do have a terrific argument on the idea that these Jewish students had their civil rights violated!
You don't actually believe that it's just on the anti-Semitism. I m...
Collection
[
|
...
]