"Well, look, I would just echo my boss, Susie Wiles, who is the best chief of staff in our nation's history, working for the greatest president in our nation's history, and that this was, unfortunately, another attempt at fake news by a reporter who was acting disingenuously, and really did take the chief's words out of context. But I think most importantly, the bias of omission was ever present throughout this story, answered Leavitt."
"I mean, clearly there was a lot of cooperation between the White House and Vanity Fair on this because there's numerous interviews that Susie Wiles had with the writer over the course of pretty much a year. Portraits were taken of his inner circle, including her, JD Vance, Stephen Miller. I mean it looks like the White House was working hand in glove with Vanity Fair,"
"The reporter omitted all of the positive things that Susie and our team said about the president and the inner workings of the White House. And as Susie said today, it's deeply unfortunate that happened, but it won't distract us from making America great again. And President Trump has been such a productive president and has accomplished more in 11 months than most presidents do in eight years because of his vision and his tenacity, which is executed on and facilitated by"
Karoline Leavitt defended Susie Wiles, calling her the best chief of staff in the nation's history and asserting that the Vanity Fair series was a disingenuous attempt at fake news. Leavitt accused the reporter of acting disingenuously, taking Wiles's words out of context, and committing a bias of omission by leaving out positive statements about the president and White House operations. Fox's John Roberts questioned apparent coordination between the White House and Vanity Fair, citing interviews and portraits of the inner circle. Leavitt said the story will not distract the team from advancing President Trump's agenda and noted Trump's productivity and accomplishments in 11 months.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]