Speaker Mike Johnson argues against the War Powers Act, claiming it's unconstitutional and infringes on the president's authority outlined in Article II of the Constitution. He supports Trump's military actions in Iran as justified under this claim. Johnson’s statements have sparked debate over the balance of power between Congress and the presidency regarding military action, with Congress retaining the exclusive right to declare war, a power not exercised since World War II. Johnson's views reflect an ideologically driven stance aligning closely with Trump's presidency.
Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument.
The strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were clearly within President Trump's Article II powers as commander-in-chief. It shouldn't even be a dispute.
Collection
[
|
...
]