The article discusses the implications of the leaked draft decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, exploring theories around its source and motives. Initially, speculation pointed toward conservative justices benefiting from the leak, as it seemed to strengthen Samuel Alito's position against John Roberts' moderate approach. Despite an investigation not identifying culprits, ongoing speculation and new FBI inquiries have revived discussions within the conservative legal movement, raising concerns about biases and transparency in the processes. Kathryn Rubino questions whether significant findings will emerge if investigations lean toward conservative implications.
In terms of motive for the leak, it just made sense, since the leak was likely to calcify Samuel Alito's scorched earth draft as the opinion of the Court.
the FBI announced MOAR investigations inspired by right-wing fever dreams, including a new investigation into the Dobbs leak. The FBI was famously kept out of the original investigation.
Collection
[
|
...
]