The article examines the culture of sycophancy within Donald Trump's political sphere, where flattery and obedience are paramount. It argues that loyalty must be unquestioning, with cronyism reinforcing status and dissent equated to heresy. The piece illustrates how Trump's domain demands submission to irrational beliefs, as demonstrated by figures like Marco Rubio, who have shifted their stances to align with Trump's ideology. This devotional atmosphere mirrors authoritarian regimes and highlights the coercive power of Trump's influence over those in his inner circle.
Loyalty must be blind. Obedience is safety. Cronyism secures status. His whim is dogma. Criticism is heresy. Expertise is bias.
The deeper the submission to madness, the greater his supremacy. The subjugation is more thorough if the things people are forced to accept are irrational.
Criticism is heresy. Debate is apostasy. Expertise is bias. Objectivity is a hoax.
Each of the concentric rings of Trump's court require different nuances of servility. At mid-level, the ethos is to mimic the irrational impulses of the ruler.
Collection
[
|
...
]