The article critiques Stephen Miller's suggestion to suspend habeas corpus privileges during an 'invasion.' It emphasizes that this right is constitutionally guaranteed and equates the proposal to a betrayal of American values and centuries of legal precedents such as the Magna Carta. The author argues that this threat to basic human rights necessitates a strong response from elected officials, as the notion posed by Miller undermines established jurisprudence and the integrity of citizenship in the United States.
"The Constitution is clear and that, of course, is the supreme law of the land, that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus could be suspended in time of invasion," said Stephen Miller. He proves himself to be a traitor not only to the American idea but also to the freaking Magna Carta, which states, 'No free man shall be seized or imprisoned...except by the lawful judgment of his equals and by the law of the land.' This statement suggests a complete reversal of centuries of established jurisprudence."},{
Collection
[
|
...
]