""Yeah, that's changed," the Massachusetts Democrat said with a laugh this month, explaining that she now finds ChatGPT to be "really valuable" for basic research questions, even if she still catches the occasional hallucination. Warren said that she began using ChatGPT more after seeing her daughter use it. She says she doesn't "rely" on the technology, but uses it to "start to approach a problem.""
""Like, I'm in the middle of reading something, and I think: How many people are there in Mississippi? And what's the breakdown of little children, and people over 65?" Warren said. "I pop that into ChatGPT and get an answer that's better than a straight Google answer. I can get more detail, and more ways to slice and dice the numbers.""
""The other day, I decided, you know what, maybe after doing all these hearings on ChatGPT, I should at least see how it works," Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri told Business Insider, saying he asked a "very nerdy historical question" to ChatGPT about the Puritans in the 1630s. "I will say that it returned a lot of good information." "I use it, despite the fact that I think it's going to destroy us," Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told Business Insider."
Several U.S. senators who previously resisted AI adoption have begun using ChatGPT for basic research and to begin approaching problems. Users report that the tool often provides more detailed answers and more ways to slice and analyze data than a straight Google search, though occasional hallucinations occur. Adoption spans political lines, with figures trying ChatGPT for historical queries, demographic breakdowns, and initial research steps. Some lawmakers use the tool sparingly and verify outputs. Personal AI use at the highest government levels remains uneven.
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]