Patently illegal': Critics dispute legality of Trump's Iran strikes
Briefly

The article discusses recent military actions by President Trump against Iran, which many Democrats and critics assert violate the US Constitution by bypassing Congressional approval. These actions have drawn bipartisan scrutiny, with legislators advocating for measures that would require Trump to seek Congressional authorization. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 is cited, emphasizing the limits on the President's military authority. Party members, including Senator Van Hollen and Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, warn that Trump's impulsive decisions could lead to long-term consequences and even grounds for impeachment, reflecting concerns about governance and adherence to constitutional checks and balances.
Democrats emphasize that only Congress, not the President, can declare war, underscoring constitutional limits on executive military actions.
Critics accuse Trump of constitutional violations for launching military strikes against Iran without Congressional approval, igniting bipartisan concerns.
Read at www.aljazeera.com
[
|
]