"In the meantime, Lisa, there were a lot of businesses who were waiting for this, a lot of consumers, and of course a lot of foreign governments who were wondering what this is going to end up being because now that the Supreme Court has ruled against the use of that power to exert these tariffs or invoke them, where's all the money that has been collected going to go? Does it have to be refunded?"
"But also, the White House has essentially said, if we lose in the Supreme Court, we have lots of other mechanisms that we can use to impose the same or similar tariffs. And so I'm really looking this morning to see how the White House deals with this backlash and what they say their next move is, because they may claim that there needs to be no interruption in these tariffs"
The Supreme Court invalidated the use of emergency authority to impose the global tariffs. The ruling creates practical questions about whether collected tariff revenues must be refunded and how refunds would be administered. The White House has signaled potential reliance on other statutory mechanisms to continue or reimpose comparable tariff measures, which could avoid interruptions. Businesses, consumers, and foreign governments face uncertainty about financial impacts and enforcement. Legal and administrative maneuvers could prolong many tariffs while litigation and policy responses play out.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]