The Supreme Court's recent decision to deem the insurrection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment irrelevant has significant implications, particularly for birthright citizenship in the U.S. Meanwhile, Harvard's surprising purchase of an original Magna Carta for under $30 illustrates the value and importance of historical documents. Additionally, investigations into AG Pam Bondi's stock dealings reveal troubling overlaps between personal financial gains and political actions. Furthermore, the withdrawal of a Jenner lawyer's security clearance showcases ongoing conflicts and repercussions within the current administration, indicating a larger crisis in the rule of law and governance.
The Supreme Court's decision to disregard the insurrection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment raises important questions about the future of birthright citizenship and legal interpretations.
The unexpected discovery of Harvard's original Magna Carta raises questions about historical accountability, the value of rare documents, and the impact such findings have on academic institutions.
The timing of AG Pam Bondiâs stock sale before the tariff announcement raises suspicions of insider trading and highlights the need for transparency in government dealings.
The ongoing retaliation against a Jenner lawyer losing security clearance reflects broader issues within the administration, emphasizing the intersection of law, politics, and personal vendettas.
Collection
[
|
...
]