The Supreme Court's decision limits individual judges from issuing nationwide injunctions against government policies, impacting federal agency operations. However, exceptions exist, such as the blocked layoffs by the Trump administration. The majority opinion in Trump v. CASA argued that universal injunctions exceed Congress's authority from 1789. Barring the national injunctions, Justice Barrett noted that the opinion does not alter how the Administrative Procedure Act allows federal courts to void agency actions, highlighting ongoing legal tensions between judiciary and executive powers.
There is nothing in the decision that appears to undercut universal relief or vacature that you see under the Administrative Procedure Act.
The 6-3 majority opinion in Trump V. CASA found national injunctions likely exceed the authority Congress bestowed upon the judiciary in 1789.
Collection
[
|
...
]