""I understand concerns about major military operations in the Middle East given past entanglements. However, the voices who counsel against getting entangled seem to ignore the consequences of letting evil go unchecked," Graham told Axios."
""But it's increasingly clear to me that voices opposing entanglement and the risk associated with decisive action are getting louder. Time will tell as to how this plays out," he said."
""I have a lot of respect for President Trump. He is his own man. And as with all presidents, he will be held responsible for his decisions on such weighty matters. As to me, history will be very clear as to where I stood, for better or worse.""
The U.S. has been presented with military options that include killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son. The U.S. team is showing limited flexibility in talks with Iran and would consider an Iranian proposal allowing token uranium enrichment if it guarantees no path to a nuclear weapon. Senator Lindsey Graham leads a pro-strike camp aligned with President Trump and recently visited Israel, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Graham sees potential for historic change in Iran and warns against ignoring malign actors. Some advisers urge delaying strikes to leverage threats for concessions, while others doubt the wisdom of regime change.
Read at Axios
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]