The article discusses the recent aggressive actions taken by President Trump against legal firms, specifically targeting Perkins Coie and Covington & Burling. These actions include revoking security clearances for lawyers and limiting their ability to represent clients. Experts believe these moves undermine the fundamental right to legal representation in the American justice system. A federal judge has temporarily blocked part of Trump's executive order against Perkins Coie, indicating a possible judicial resistance to these executive actions. Additionally, concerns regarding hiring practices related to diversity programs at Georgetown Law are noted, illustrating broader issues in legal ethics.
President Trump's retribution campaign against law firms undermines a central tenet of the American legal system - the right to a lawyer to argue vigorously on one's behalf.
This is certainly the biggest affront to the legal profession in my lifetime, said Samuel W. Buell, a longtime professor of law at Duke University.
A federal judge temporarily barred a major portion of Mr. Trump's executive order against Perkins Coie from taking effect, indicating potential judicial pushback.
The top federal prosecutor in Washington threatened to stop hiring Georgetown Law graduates unless diversity programs were abolished, highlighting tensions in the legal community.
Collection
[
|
...
]