Justices seem inclined to revive Trump policy blocking migrants at border

"The case centers on how to interpret U.S. immigration laws saying that any noncitizen who 'arrives in' the country must be allowed to apply for asylum. Under the policy at issue, called 'metering,' federal border officials had been intercepting migrants approaching U.S. ports of entry and turning them back before they could reach American soil."

"Trump officials said those migrants were exploiting the system, while immigrant advocates said they were fleeing desperate conditions. Tuesday's case is one of an array of immigration clashes headed to the Supreme Court, as the political battle over the issue increasingly plays out in the judicial system."

"The Trump administration appealed, arguing it is a 'critical tool' to address surges of migrants at the border. In the dispute over metering, lower courts have sided with the migrants and blocked the policy."

The Supreme Court is considering a policy that would enable U.S. border agents to block migrants from entering to seek asylum. This policy, known as 'metering,' allows officials to intercept migrants before they reach U.S. soil. The Trump administration argues that this policy aligns with immigration laws, while migrants contend they should be allowed to apply for asylum. Lower courts have previously blocked this policy, but the administration views it as essential for managing migrant surges at the border.

Read at The Washington Post