A jury ruled that The New York Times did not libel Sarah Palin over a 2017 editorial that she claimed damaged her reputation. Palin testified to increased death threats and emotional distress following the editorial, which suggested her political action committee fostered a violent atmosphere. Despite her argument that the Times acted with reckless disregard for the truth, the jury reached a verdict after minimal deliberation, emphasizing the complexities and implications of media accountability amid claims of defamation.
"To this day, there been no accountability. That's why we're here." - Kenneth Turkel, emphasizing the perceived lack of responsibility from the New York Times in damaging Palin's reputation.
"It may have been to them an honest mistake. For her, it was a life changer." - Kenneth Turkel, highlighting the profound personal impact of the editorial on Sarah Palin.
Collection
[
|
...
]