A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the Federal Trade Commission's investigation of Media Matters, determining that the FTC's civil investigative demand likely constitutes retaliation for constitutionally protected speech. The judge highlighted that such government actions should alarm Americans, especially when targeting newsgathering activities. The ruling concerns FTC demands related to Media Matters' reporting on an advertising boycott affecting Elon Musk's platform, X. The judge noted the chilling effect of the FTC's inquiry on Media Matters' journalistic pursuits, indicating a protective stance on free speech and reporting obligations.
U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan emphasized that it should alarm all Americans when the Government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate.
The judge granted a preliminary injunction to halt the FTC's civil investigative demand, indicating that the demand was likely retaliatory against Media Matters for its public reporting activities.
The FTC's demand letter sought information on Media Matters' engagements with other organizations, which the judge noted could deter journalistic endeavors, causing self-censorship.
The ruling signals a significant protection for organizations engaged in reporting, especially against governmental overreach in matters of free speech and public accountability.
Collection
[
|
...
]