John Durham's investigation into Hillary Clinton alleged that she had a scheme to discredit Donald Trump, claiming she would fabricate evidence against him. This premise relied on misrepresented information that misidentified the actual plans of Russian spies. Evidence suggests Hillary Clinton was framed instead, as the CIA's referral memo included details that contradicted Durham's assertions. Furthermore, a redaction related to Guccifer 2.0 in the report raises questions about the substance and accuracy of Durham's claims, which rely heavily on dubious evidence and interpretations of available documents.
John Durham's investigation was based on claims that Hillary Clinton planned to smear Donald Trump using false evidence instead of accurate information regarding Russian plans.
The referral memo indicating a plan to frame Hillary Clinton from the Russians does not align with Durham's claims and was characterized by an important redaction.
E-mails suggest the Russian intelligence agency was focused on framing Hillary Clinton rather than the smearing of Donald Trump, contradicting Durham's narrative.
The complexities of the Guccifer 2.0 references in the Durham annex reveal potential misinterpretations that may intertwine with critical attribution discussions.
Collection
[
|
...
]