Donald Trump's priority to end the Gaza war is questioned by analysts who say his ceasefire call lacks necessary US leverage over Israel. Despite military aid and diplomatic support, pressure on Prime Minister Netanyahu to negotiate remains absent. Netanyahu’s commitment to finish operations against Hamas contradicts ceasefire intentions. Brian Finucane highlights a need for the US to use military support as leverage to pressure Israel. Potential optimism for a 60-day truce exists, but successful negotiation requires a shift in US policy towards Israel.
Analysts point out that Trump's call for a ceasefire in Gaza lacks effectiveness without applying US leverage on Israel to achieve meaningful negotiations. They cite the significant military aid the US provides to Israel as a crucial tool for influencing Prime Minister Netanyahu's decisions. For a lasting ceasefire, pressure must be applied to ensure Hamas is not only defeated but also to bring about a constructive dialogue for peace.
Brian Finucane, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, noted the similarities between Trump's approach and that of President Biden, emphasizing that both administrations have demanded a ceasefire but failed to pressure Israel effectively. He described Trump's mixed messaging as frustrating and a continuation of patterns seen previously, suggesting that a true commitment to ceasefire requires leveraging US military aid.
Collection
[
|
...
]