I analyzed the 'second Charlie Kirk shooter'. I know what happened...
Briefly

I analyzed the 'second Charlie Kirk shooter'. I know what happened...
"He pointed out the way Kirk's head snapped to the right was due to the impact from the bullet coming head on, not to the side where the man was. He analyzed the footage frame by frame, showing no gun, smoke, recoil, or flash from the man in the navy blue shirt, who appeared to just be holding a napkin."
"He continued: 'I'm just telling you what is physically possible and how the human body works under, well, the stress of a bullet. 'Nobody to the right of Charlie took a magic shot that has no [entry] wound and especially there is no muscle flash, there's no smoke, there's no recoil, and the exit wound doesn't behave like an exit wound should behave.'"
Conspiracy theories claimed a man in a navy blue shirt standing near the stage acted as a covert second shooter by hiding a gun under his folded arm. Behavioral expert Jesús Enrique Rosas analyzed frame-by-frame footage and audio forensics and concluded that physics and observed reactions make a sideways shot impossible. Kirk's head snapped consistent with a frontal impact, and no gun, smoke, recoil, muzzle flash, or muscle flash appeared on the man. Audio timing suggested the bullet traveled roughly 140 yards. Utah student Tyler Robinson has been charged, and bullet forensics are still needed to confirm wound path and bullet location.
Read at Mail Online
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]