President Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear sites represents a significant shift in U.S. military policy and a high-stakes gamble with potential repercussions. The strikes, aimed at Iran's most fortified installations, occurred after assurances of a likely successful operation. While this military action might compel Iran to engage in negotiations, it poses the risk of dragging the U.S. into a more extensive 'regime change' strategy, contrary to Trump's prior promises of avoiding direct military entanglement.
With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, U.S. President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war.
The dramatic U.S. strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies.
The attack could force Iran to negotiate but risks drawing the U.S. into a 'regime change' effort.
U.S. officials noted the mission was ordered after assurance of a 'high probability of success'.
Collection
[
|
...
]