In his initial 100 days, President Trump employed old immigration laws, questionably challenged judicial authority, and sought to terminate several legal immigration processes. His portrayal of immigrants as invaders contributing to crime has been consistently debunked by experts, who argue that legal definitions of invasion do not apply. Trumpâs approach to immigration, including reliance on national security claims to limit judicial scrutiny, represents a notable shift from past practices, raising concerns among legal experts about accountability and rule of law.
Trump's administration has leveraged vague national security claims to bypass judicial review, marking a significant departure from previous administrations' adherence to legal norms.
Experts assert that Trump's portrayal of immigration as an 'invasion' lacks factual support, contradicting legal definitions and promoting unfounded fears around crime and national security.
#immigration-policy #trump-administration #judicial-authority #national-security #legal-accountability
Collection
[
|
...
]