Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has carefully navigated his responses regarding Taiwan, showcasing a strategy of strategic ambiguity. On February 26, Trump refrained from committing to defending Taiwan from potential Chinese aggression, stating he doesn't want to 'reveal his cards.' This approach aligns with his suggestion that Taiwan should contribute financially to its defense, reflecting a broader transactional policy in foreign relations. Experts suggest that if Beijing reaches a favorable agreement with Washington, it may pursue control over Taiwan with reduced U.S. interference. Overall, Trump's rhetoric indicates a cautious stance that may influence U.S.-Taiwan relations significantly.
Trump's refusal to offer clear commitments regarding Taiwan reflects a continuance of strategic ambiguity in U.S. foreign policy, aimed at preserving negotiating power.
Trump articulated that Taiwan must contribute to U.S. defense efforts, likening U.S.-Taiwan relations to an insurance company, indicating a transactional approach to alliances.
Since returning, Trump's cautious language surrounding Taiwan signals an avoidance of commitment while hinting at transactional dynamics in U.S. foreign policy toward allies.
Kevin Chen noted that China's ability to control Taiwan might occur with less U.S. intervention, contingent on a potential deal between Beijing and Washington.
Collection
[
|
...
]