""This rollout, first of all, is never meant to be a rollout. It was meant to be a hard deadline. But it's done a number on all of us because it's just been handled so sloppily, and names have not been redacted when they should have been.""
""It does feel that way. And I think something that we're finding is it actually moves to a point that like the those in power prey on the vulnerable. And that is something that we have seen time and time again. It is really at the heart of all exploitation, Bensky said.""
""It feels like you know he's talking to Marjorie Taylor Greene about that we don't have the merit to be in the people's house, which by the way, it's the people house. This is not a country club with his name on the side of it. You know, there's no monogram. It's just wild to me. Like, there's a statistic out there that there are one in four women who have been assaulted or abused so when you think about about that number across""
The administration released Epstein-related files on a rolling basis after missing a statutory deadline and failed to fully redact names. A victim's phone number was revealed in the release, prompting claims that the process exposes survivors and shields powerful individuals. The release was mandated by law following congressional votes. Critics described the handling as sloppy, citing incomplete redactions and slow, incremental disclosure. The procedural approach has been characterized as an additional punishment for survivors. Concerns were raised about elites preying on the vulnerable and about the broader prevalence of sexual assault among women, with calls for better redaction and prompt, comprehensive disclosure.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]