Congressman Accuses Department of Justice of Covering Up' Files That Would Implicate Donald Trump' in Epstein's Sex Trafficking Conspiracy'

"I want to know what's in those 2.5 million files that have not been released. Based on the way that they released and poorly and illegally redacted, as well as what they covered up even within those documents, it is clear that the Department of Justice is covering up for Donald Trump. I went to the House floor and exposed one document in particular that they claimed was privileged, and they redacted it from the public, but then they allowed Congress members of Congress who went to see the files to actually see it, and there was nothing in there that should have been redacted."

"They made up some bogus explanation of attorney-client privilege. It is not anything approximating attorney-client privilege, and instead it's using these privileges, using the various different mechanisms that they are falsely using, to cover up. He continued, So I want to know what's in those 2.5 million pages, because I am almost certain right now that there is a lot more material that would implicate Donald Trump in some aspect of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy."

"And I don't mean necessarily that Donald Trump is guilty of being a co-conspirator, but he was involved in some way, and perhaps in more ways than we even know about, and that is being covered up. There is no reason for them to cover up 2.5 million pages. One of the things they've said is they're duplicates. If they're duplicates, turn them over. There's no reason not to, Goldman argued."

"But I don't believe they're duplicates because otherwise they would just turn them over. There's no reason to hold back dup"

The DOJ is accused of withholding and heavily redacting millions of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein. Rep. Dan Goldman says the government refused to release 2.5 million files and that the redactions appear poorly done and potentially unlawful. He claims a document shown to Congress was redacted from the public despite containing nothing that should have been removed, and he rejects the stated attorney-client privilege justification. Goldman argues there is no reason to withhold the records if they are duplicates, and he believes the remaining material could implicate President Donald Trump in Epstein’s sex trafficking conspiracy in some way.

Read at www.mediaite.com