Perkins Coie achieved a significant legal victory by securing a permanent injunction against a retaliatory executive order from the Trump administration. This case illustrates the tension between legal firms and political power, particularly for those that choose not to advocate for their principles. Many firms face fallout for their silence on such issues, including unwanted entanglements in police brutality cases and the potential loss of talented law students. Additionally, there are ramifications regarding shifting client relationships, as clients are leaving firms that do not resist the administration's policies. The article also touches upon California's bar exam troubles and the repercussions of political threats against high-profile attorneys such as Amal Clooney.
Perkins Coie successfully secured a permanent injunction against the Trump administration's retaliatory executive order, marking a significant legal victory.
Firms that did not oppose the administration's actions are seeing direct repercussions, including involvement in police brutality cases and potential loss of students to competing institutions.
The legal landscape is shifting, as high-profile clients are reconsidering their partnerships with firms that refuse to confront the Trump administrationâs policies.
California's current bar exam controversy reflects ongoing challenges within the legal education system, coupled with the looming threat against Amal Clooney by the White House.
Collection
[
|
...
]