"The ruling is a political embarrassment to the administration, which might now have to issue refunds on up to $142 billion of tariff revenue. But the Court's decision is less significant economically-with time and effort, Trump can largely reconstitute the tariff regime that was just overthrown-than it is democratically. The Court, despite its conservative majority, has enforced the limits on arbitrary presidential authority that congressional Republicans were too timid to enforce themselves."
"IEEPA has been routinely used to impose sanctions but never to impose tariffs. Trump seized on that ambiguous language to impose tariffs by executive order, with no involvement of Congress (which is given the exclusive power to collect taxes and tariffs in Article I of the Constitution). After declaring national emergencies over fentanyl smuggling and illegal immigration, Trump imposed tariffs on goods entering from China, Canada, and Mexico, among other countries."
The Supreme Court ruled many of Donald Trump's tariffs illegal, potentially obligating refunds up to $142 billion. The tariffs were imposed under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a statute routinely used for sanctions but not previously for tariffs. Trump declared national emergencies over fentanyl smuggling and illegal immigration and used IEEPA to impose tariffs on goods from China, Canada, Mexico, and others. The Court's decision constrains arbitrary presidential authority and reinforces congressional primacy over taxes and tariffs under Article I. Economically, the ruling may be reversible over time, but democratically it reasserts institutional limits that Congress did not enforce.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]