Donald Trumpâs recent executive orders aimed at high-profile law firms prompted a swift and profound response from the legal community. While some firms chose to ally with the administration, others, including Perkins Coie and Jenner & Block, opted to challenge the orders in court, citing constitutional violations. These firms are well-represented by top legal minds, which has put the administration at a significant disadvantage. Judge Beryl Howell's skepticism towards the government's arguments underscored the legal battleâs gravity, as the judiciary appears receptive to the claims made by the fighting law firms.
In a memo to staff, Karp justified Paul Weiss' move to cut a deal with Trump by saying that leadership had 'incredibly difficult decisions' to make.
US District Judge Beryl Howell seemed incredulous at the government's arguments, often directing sarcastic questions, indicating the administration's position lacked merit.
The firms suing the government are working with legal heavyweights, making the administration notably 'outgunned' in court as they face formidable legal representation.
Four law firms opted to fight the administration in court by arguing that the executive orders violate constitutional principles and clients' rights.
Collection
[
|
...
]