Three women and two doctors are challenging a Kansas law that voids advance medical directives for pregnant individuals, asserting that it infringes on personal autonomy and equal protection rights. While many states place restrictions on medical decisions of pregnant patients, Kansas stands out by invalidating directives regardless of fetal viability. Sparked by a recent controversial case in Georgia involving a pregnant brain-dead woman, this lawsuit seeks to address the intersection of end-of-life care and abortion restrictions in a post-Roe context, highlighting the need for legal clarity in such ethical dilemmas.
The state's law unjustly, discriminatorily, and categorically disregards their clearly expressed end-of-life decisions when they are pregnant, limiting their autonomy and rights.
Such restrictions have been in place for decades and rarely challenged in court, but scrutiny of end-of-life laws surged after a controversial case in Georgia.
Collection
[
|
...
]