"I don't have much confidence in the government. I don't have much sense that the majority of this stuff has been read thoroughly. When these files were released, a number of things seemed to have been released by mistake. The implication of that is that they didn't know exactly what they were releasing. But it's also really awful stuff. Pictures of women and young girls without any kind of redaction. They're identifiable, nude. Very upsetting, essentially."
"The Times built its own internal search engine to sort through the sludge. It doesn't just search for specific words; you can ask it to search for concepts like bribery. And these documents aren't just emails about President Donald Trump, or giddy vacation planning for rich folks hoping to hop a ride to Epstein's infamous island. There are photos and videos, even bank records."
The Department of Justice released approximately three million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein after bipartisan pressure. Many documents appear unredacted, including identifiable nude photographs of women and young girls, raising serious privacy and legal concerns. Some materials seem to have been released inadvertently, suggesting limited review and redaction. The collection includes emails, photos, videos, and bank records that may indicate connections to wealthy and powerful individuals. An internal search tool was used to analyze concepts beyond keyword matching. Officials claim the release satisfies congressional demands, but additional undisclosed material likely remains.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]