The complaint filed by Latoreya Hill details how Judge Kenneth J. King "berated the minor on a live platform, ordered her jailed, caused her to be handcuffed, demanded that she take off her clothes and change into jail garb, imprisoned her for hours, and then conducted a fake trial with her classmates (and possibly his internet followers) as her jurors and his audience." This shocking account highlights the inappropriate behavior of a judge in a courtroom setting, where professionalism and respect should have prevailed.
Gary Felty, attorney at Fieger Law, emphasized that Judge King had no judicial immunity in this incident because it occurred outside the formal court proceedings: "court was not in session when the judge violated the teenager's rights." This statement underlines the complexities of judicial conduct and the limits of immunity when a judge steps outside their defined role.
The lawsuit accuses Judge Kenneth J. King of various serious offenses, including malicious prosecution and unlawful detention. The legal implications of this case highlight the serious accountability issues within the judiciary, especially regarding the treatment of vulnerable individuals like minors.
Latoreya Hill's attorney pointed out the profound emotional impact on the teenager, stating that she feels "absolutely humiliated and upset." This underscores the psychological toll that such actions can have on young individuals when subjected to harsh treatment by those in positions of power.
Collection
[
|
...
]