The ruling stated that state financing for the religious public school violated the state's charter school act, as well as state and U.S. constitutions.
Supporters argue similar funding precedents exist, but the court emphasized the restriction of public funds for religious institutions.
School representatives highlighted the demand for choice in education and expressed determination to appeal, aiming to serve diverse families.
The Attorney General viewed the decision as a win for religious freedom, aligning with the U.S. Constitution's principles.
Collection
[
|
...
]