Key takeaways from the U.S. airstrikes on Iran. And, how Iran could respond
Briefly

The Trump administration defended its controversial airstrikes on Iran's nuclear targets, which occurred without congressional consent and were intended to thwart nuclear weapon development. While the strikes were meant to cripple Iran's nuclear program, experts suggest that the impact was less significant than the administration claimed. The decision drew bipartisan criticism, with Democrats voicing strong opposition and some Republicans questioning its constitutionality. Polls show a majority of Americans favor non-involvement in military conflicts. Moreover, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu emphasized Israel's commitment to degrade Iran's military capabilities, reflecting broader tensions in the region.
The U.S. airstrikes on Iran, conducted without congressional approval, aimed to prevent nuclear weapon development, igniting critiques from Democrats and constitutional concerns from some Republicans.
Before the strikes, polls indicated that most Americans preferred non-involvement in military conflicts, despite the Trump administration's contention that intervention was necessary to protect U.S. interests.
Read at www.npr.org
[
|
]