Columbia should have said, see you in court,' not yes, Mr President.' | Margaret Sullivan
Briefly

The article reflects on the challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity, drawing parallels between the author's experience as a newsroom editor and recent issues at Columbia University regarding ethics and external pressures. The author emphasizes that capitulating to powerful advertisers or political figures compromises the core values of journalism, proposing that principled stances must be upheld even when faced with significant threats. The discussion serves as a reminder of the crucial role ethics play in the media landscape.
Allowing oneself or one's institution to be bullied or threatened into compliance is never the right answer; some principles are central to integrity.
As editor, I would face pressure from powerful advertisers, but true journalistic integrity means standing firm against threats and prioritizing truth.
The situation at Columbia University reflects a broader issue in journalism ethics, emphasizing the need for courage when faced with external pressures.
My experience as a newsroom editor taught me that the threat of losing an advertiser should not dictate editorial decisions; integrity must prevail.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]