Mr. Walz's performance improved as he confronted Mr. Vance about Trump’s 2020 election loss, directly questioning his evasive response. This exchange marked a pivotal moment in the debate.
The first part of the debate was marked by substantial discussions on various policies such as foreign affairs and climate change, with both candidates maintaining a civil discourse.
Vance faced scrutiny over misleading statements during the debate, notably regarding immigration's impact on housing prices and the distribution of benefits from Trump’s tax cuts.
Despite occasional missteps and nervous moments, Mr. Walz managed to regain his composure as the debate progressed, particularly during the crucial discussion about election integrity.
Collection
[
|
...
]