Trump's strategy of outsourcing his ground game to super PACs due to a cash shortage starkly contrasts with Kamala Harris’s robust grassroots fundraising, showing significant electoral consequences.
By exploiting the Citizens United decision, Trump relies on wealthy donors for his campaign; however, the lack of authentic grassroots support limits the effectiveness of this strategy in elections.
Harris' ability to raise money predominantly from small-dollar donors gives her a significant advantage over Trump, who struggles with direct donations, leading to a critical cash flow problem.
In the third quarter, Harris raised $1 billion while Trump managed only $417 million, highlighting a major disparity in financial support and its implications for their campaigns.
Collection
[
|
...
]