Following Donald Trump's election win, federal officials may consider winding down two major criminal cases against him, citing a longstanding DOJ policy that prevents prosecution of sitting presidents. This interpretation stems from a 1973 policy asserting that a president cannot be tried while in office. Additionally, a Supreme Court ruling supports Trump's claim for immunity, particularly for actions related to his official duties.
Trump's legal battles, which include allegations of election interference and mishandling classified documents, seem poised to be effectively shelved due to his upcoming presidency. Legal experts suggest that the presumption of a sitting president's immunity could create significant challenges for prosecutors aiming to advance these cases. The parallel between Trump's election victory and past interpretations of presidential immunity has once again stirred debate over the limits of accountability for sitting leaders.
Collection
[
|
...
]