In a landmark judicial race, Susan Crawford triumphed over Brad Schimel, bolstered by significant financial backing, including contributions from Elon Musk. This election was notable for being the most expensive in history and crucial in maintaining Wisconsin's liberal majority on its Supreme Court. Many states, like Wisconsin, employ public elections to fill Supreme Court positions, while others have varied selection processes. Furthermore, retention elections allow voters to decide if sitting judges should remain in office, expanding public involvement in the judiciary.
In one of the most expensive judicial races in history, Susan Crawford's victory over Trump-endorsed candidate Brad Schimel preserved Wisconsin's liberal majority on the Supreme Court.
Wisconsin is among 21 states that utilize popular elections for their supreme court judges, reflecting a broader trend in state-level judicial selection.
Only 16 states use alternative methods like legislative elections or gubernatorial appointments for initial terms, allowing the public a say in retention elections.
For detailed insights on which states utilize popular elections for judicial positions, you can explore the interactive map available on the Brennan Center for Justice's website.
Collection
[
|
...
]