Noah Rothman criticized JD Vance's incendiary comments about Liz Cheney, suggesting they represent an empty kind of discourse that lacks substantive analysis of geopolitics.
Vance's rhetoric, conflating Liz Cheney with Dick Cheney, revives a discredited narrative that links political motivations to profit, illustrating a crude analysis of war motives.
By claiming Cheney profits from military conflicts, Vance reveals a troubling trend in Republican dialogue that shuns genuine discussion about foreign policy and security.
Rothman highlighted that Vance's comments reflect a broader trend among Republicans seeking to distance from traditional constituencies, prioritizing sensationalism over serious discourse.
Collection
[
|
...
]