Jack Smith's closing argument revealed that his thwarted prosecution, aimed at upholding the rule of law, paradoxically may have enhanced the legal immunity of future presidents.
The judicial obstacles Jack Smith faced, including rulings from the courts Mr. Trump influenced, diminished the potential impact of his work, resulting in greater immunity for future presidents.
Lawyer Peter Zeidenberg expressed respect for Jack Smith, acknowledging his struggles against insurmountable roadblocks in enforcing the law against Donald Trump, which left justice unserved.
Smith's work, while unsuccessful, highlighted the limitations of both the courts and the Justice Department in holding a former president accountable for legal transgressions.
Collection
[
|
...
]