Feline frenzy: could cats swing the US election?
Briefly

JD Vance's 2021 remark about Democrats lacking children highlights a broader political taboo regarding parenthood's perceived role in governance, suggesting a disconnect between leaders and childless citizens.
Harris’s campaign response condemned Vance’s narrative as not just anti-family, but explicitly anti-women, emphasizing how political discourse can selectively define family roles, alienating many.
Jennifer Aniston’s Instagram response underscores the personal impact of Vance's remarks, revealing vulnerabilities around infertility and the broader implications of childlessness in political identity.
The backlash against Vance points to a growing awareness of diverse family structures, as it aims to redefine what representation looks like in modern American politics.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
]
[
|
]