"Madiba Dennie stated, 'This is a great example of playing gerrymandering games and winning gerrymandering prizes. In Rucho, the Supreme Court said it didn't think the Founding Fathers really intended federal courts to police gerrymandering.'"
"Dahlia Lithwick noted the Republican complaints following the vote, questioning whether the Supreme Court's decisions have enabled such electoral strategies, particularly referencing Rucho v. Common Cause."
Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment that allows Democrats to gain up to four additional seats in the House of Representatives. This decision was made in response to President Trump's encouragement of partisan gerrymandering in red states. The new map, which gives Democrats a 10-1 advantage, aims to counteract Republican gains from recent gerrymandering efforts. The Supreme Court's ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause has facilitated this electoral strategy, as it limits federal court intervention in gerrymandering cases.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]